Asus M4N98TD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus M4N98TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110414
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '17 at 18:34
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Phenom II X4 B55
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43.2% Average
SC Int 77.1
SC Float 46.4
SC Mixed 58.2
48% 60.6 Pts
QC Int 306
QC Float 188
QC Mixed 225
55% 240 Pts
MC Int 303
MC Float 187
MC Mixed 236
37% 242 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 90.7
Reflection 75.9
Parallax 101
29% 89.3 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 93.7
Splatting 87.4
34% 81.2 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 39%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos 240GB-$90
26GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.7% Poor
Read 103
Write 80.4
Mixed 80.1
20% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 8.35
55% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 20.7
DQ Write 61.5
DQ Mixed 7.27
15% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 76%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$98
889GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 145
Write 137
Mixed 120
100% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 2.74
4K Mixed 0.29
124% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 97%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
117GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 10000 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 110
Write 116
Mixed 76.7
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 2.59
4K Mixed 0.61
154% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 67%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 126GB
110GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 22.1
Write 7.56
Mixed 12.7
16% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.73
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 1.28
114% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 75%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M4N98TD EVO Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M4N98TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $740
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $114
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $200SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback