Average Bench: 29.6% (120th of 650)

Based on 74,011 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 6810 Models: AMD Radeon R9 200, ASUS R9 270X

Very poor average bench

The AMD R9 270X averaged 70.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 37.8fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 30.2fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 270X is just 6%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 270X performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 46.1fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 33.4fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 74,011 samples)
Min Avg Max
32.8 Lighting 37.8 40.9
29.8 Reflection 33.6 36.2
41.8 Parallax 46.1 50.5
30.9% 39.2 fps
Min Avg Max
28.2 MRender 30.2 32.5
30.8 Gravity 33.4 35.7
36.3 Splatting 39.1 42
18.7% 34.2 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Lighting 37.1
Reflection 36.3
Parallax 48.4
30% 40.6 fps
MRender 33.4
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 27.4
20% 32.1 fps
Sapphire(174B E270) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 47.6
30% 41.2 fps
MRender 33.2
Gravity 34.8
Splatting 27
20% 31.7 fps
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 46.4
30% 40.3 fps
MRender 32.5
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 26.5
19% 31 fps
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 37.4
Parallax 45.6
29% 39.4 fps
MRender 31.8
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 26.1
19% 30.6 fps
XFX(1682 9275) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Lighting 30.7
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 43
24% 25.6 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 22.1
17% 27.2 fps
74,011 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 35,787,974 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 74,011 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $199 @ launch in Oct '13)
Sapphire(174B E271) 30% 29% ± 2%
Sapphire R9 270X 2GB Dual-X Boost OC
11217-01-20G
Sapphire R9 270X 4GB Dual-X Boost OC
11217-04-20G
Asus(1043 0464) 15% 30% ± 3%
Asus R9 270X 2GB DirectCU II
R9270X-DC2T-2GD5
Gigabyte(1458 2272) 10% 30% ± 2%
Gigabyte R9 270X 2GB WINDFORCE
GV-R927XOC-2GD
Gigabyte R9 270X 4GB WINDFORCE
GV-R927XOC-4GD
MSI(1462 3030) 10% 30% ± 1%
XFX(1682 9275) 7% 29% ± 2%
Sapphire(174B E272) 5% 32% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B E270) 4% 30% ± 1%
Asus(1043 04A1) 4% 30% ± 2%
PowerColor(148C 2336) 3% 30% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 2336) 2% 29% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 227D) 2% 29% ± 4%
Asus(1043 0460) 2% 29% ± 2%
PowerColor(148C 2340) 2% 32% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 201C) 1% 30% ± 1%
MSI(1462 3036) 1% 30% ± 1%
MSI(1462 3033) 1% 32% ± 1%
MSI(1462 303A) 1% 27% ± 4%
Asus(1043 04A3) 0% 29% ± 1%
AMD(1002 0B04) 0% 29% ± 0%
MSI(1462 3037) 0% 30% ± 0%
Device(BEAD 0000) 0% 30% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical R9 270X Builds (Compare 7,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $485

Popular R9 270X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 6 years ago.

Terrible

28 days ago.

It played most games on med-high


Terrible

13 months ago.

Still going strong medium to high on current intensive games. "2019"


Excellent

5 days ago.

H


Excellent

10 months ago.

be it on lower settings 270x still holds its own in 2019-20


Excellent

17 days ago.

The beat gpu for the money.I buyed one of this for only 50 bucks.I love it.


Excellent

2 years ago.

Comment 

im using this card GIGABYTE AMD RADEON R9 270x 4GB DDR5 with 3 monitors 27inch .. excellent work and games in 5760x1080 resolution :) this resolution some games on ultra details, and other all games on high details ... in 1920x1080 all games run on ULTRA details :) 3 monitors connected via DVI, DVI, HDMI.—Feb '15


Poor

6 months ago.

cheap price but great performance


Excellent

1 month ago.

Works for all games on suprisingly high settings


Poor

17 months ago.

Crazy bad value


Excellent

6 months ago.

Great card for esports, 4gb variant is even better, can get over 60fps on average, pull the trigger if you find a used one for under 70 usd


Excellent

2 years ago.

Beast card. There are deffinitely better choices as of 2018, but even now, it delivers a good experience on moderate graphic settings.


Your
opinion?
650 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback