Asrock B85 Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock B85 Killer (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140917
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '17 at 14:24
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 84.2 1-Core 129 2-Core 261 87% 158 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 463 62% 466 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3161) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	53% Above average	Lighting 66 Reflection 61.2 Parallax 54.1 54% 60.5 fps	MRender 72.8 Gravity 64.2 Splatting 55.3 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 7743233 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 -86002425132119 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 938 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 141 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 24 35 64426803224 (C2) HDA temperature 24 35 64426803224 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7743233 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7743233 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7743233 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 34359738369 (E9) Unknown 0 0 7539 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6542 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6542 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6682 (F4) Unknown 99 99 4063284	61.9% Good	Read 408 Write 120 Mixed 179 51% 236 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 15.1 121% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 14 30% 58.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 75%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 385GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 177 1800 (04) Start/Stop count 73 73 27905 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9744 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4595 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 279 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 714 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 36 36 494046 (C2) HDA temperature 125 100 22 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	50.4% Above average	Read 87.2 Write 88.1 Mixed 78.2 64% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.23 85% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 50%
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 58GB free Firmware: 04.01G04 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 747 (03) Spinup time 187 184 1608 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10156 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5186 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6186 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 719 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 185 185 47400 (C2) HDA temperature 124 93 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	22.7% Poor	Read 40 Write 38.7 Mixed 37.4 29% 38.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GB 3,931 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 10.1 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85 Killer Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock B85 Killer - $130

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	50x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	26x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	31x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	8x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	7x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $624

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16