HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3029h
Memory	0.6 GB free of 2.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111115
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '17 at 20:54
Run Duration	448 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 1640B 140 User benchmarks, average bench 34% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Memory 60.9 1-Core 33.5 2-Core 24.5 31% 39.6 Pts	4-Core 34.1 8-Core 34.2 5% 34.2 Pts	64-Core 35.1 2% 35.1 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 3100 Graphics 1,215 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 3029) 256MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.4% Terrible	Lighting 0.43 Reflection 0.73 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.44 fps	MRender 0.57 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.83 0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.4% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 160GB-$34 2,739 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: GMBO Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 63.7 Write 56.9 Mixed 57.7 45% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.35 73% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 41%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB 1,289 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 64GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 22.7 Write 22.3 Mixed 11.7 23% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.34 72% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 22%
TOSHIBA MK2546GSX 250GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 6GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 22.2 Write 21 Mixed 21.2 28% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.25 43% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 16%
USB Flash Disk 4GB 2,580 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	4.78% Terrible	Read 20.4 Write 4.51 Mixed 6.83 11% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.43 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.006 13% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.78% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 35GB 2,113 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 1024, 1024, 33792 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 4.1 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 1.9 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 19%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor

CPU
Athlon Dual Core 5200BAMDBench 38%, 321 samples	8x
Athlon Dual Core 5000BAMDBench 38%, 530 samples	6x
Athlon Dual Core 4450BAMD $21Bench 35%, 535 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon 3100 GraphicsATIBench 0%, 1,215 samples	19x
HD 5870AMDBench 19%, 10,176 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
35GBUnknownBench 13%, 2,113 samples	10x
41GBUnknownBench 17%, 2,583 samples	6x
39GBUnknownBench 18%, 2,202 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16