Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite A215 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA IALAA
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20080225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '20 at 17:20
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	64%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-57 456 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Memory 36.2 1-Core 22 2-Core 26.6 20% 28.3 Pts	4-Core 32.1 8-Core 29.9 4% 31 Pts	64-Core 31.7 2% 31.7 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon X1200 Toshiba(1179 FF00) 128MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.393.0.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.23 Reflection 0.23 0% 0.23 fps

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2035GSS 200GB-$285 1,108 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: DK020M SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 23 24 25 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 21.3 Write 26.3 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 21.5 16% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 71% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 512, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.81% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.53 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 1.7 4% 1.57 GB/s	Latency 221 18% 221 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.81% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16