Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	23.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 78.7 1-Core 69.3 2-Core 128 56% 91.8 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 331 32% 262 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 63%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 Series 127GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 31 41 25 32 26 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.9% Poor	Read 85.3 Write 174 Mixed 164 SusWrite 43.6 27% 117 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 4.5 48% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 74.6 DQ Mixed 88 69% 95.8 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: MN6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 32 39 22 31 25 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 160 Write 167 Mixed 88.7 SusWrite 42.9 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 2 335% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 2x4GB 4,196 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.8% Average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 13.2 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 7670AMDBench 6%, 3,465 samples	2x

RAM
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 10GBMicronBench 28%, 2 samples	1x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GBMicronBench 44%, 1 sample	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16