Asus P5B-Deluxe

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P5B-Deluxe (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080930
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '17 at 04:07
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Memory 71.4 1-Core 36.2 2-Core 77.8 41% 61.8 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 152 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1900 170 User benchmarks, average bench 2% AMD(1002 0B12) 512MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	1.81% Terrible	Lighting 3.37 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 1.69 3% 2.58 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.81% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 223GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3347972 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 77472620085248 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 4 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 29 29 94491181085 (C2) HDA temperature 29 29 94491181085 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3347972 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3347972 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3347972 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1 (F4) Unknown 100 100 131072	54.9% Above average	Read 260 Write 208 Mixed 208 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 19 85% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 53.3 65% 113 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 85%
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56 10,555 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFZ10.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 38 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 82 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 61 (C2) HDA temperature 68 66 146030198816 (F1) Unknown 100 100 12081	38.5% Below average	Read 247 Write 61.8 Mixed 124 31% 144 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 8.73 69% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 65.5 DQ Mixed 0.83 31% 77.4 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 89%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174 8,506 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 57822148 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 477 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 62876038 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2668 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 445 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 81605623836 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 52 521601055 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 53 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 493 (C2) HDA temperature 31 48 42949672991 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 44 30 57822148 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 39449274617461 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2421308456 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1198086759	55.1% Above average	Read 99.2 Write 93 Mixed 23.9 52% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.41 92% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 73%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 233GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 205 190 4725 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1791 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7370 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1755 (BE) vendor-specific 63 42 37 (C2) HDA temperature 113 92 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.2% Below average	Read 59.9 Write 62.3 Mixed 25.6 36% 49.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 2.23 4K Mixed 0.52 130% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 35%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 12GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 207 191 4608 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1825 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7405 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1755 (BE) vendor-specific 60 36 40 (C2) HDA temperature 110 86 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29.3% Poor	Read 49.1 Write 52.6 Mixed 45.8 37% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.3 77% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 35%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB 201 User benchmarks, average bench 194% 233GB free, PID 61f3 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	185% Outstanding	Read 255 Write 236 Mixed 236 309% 242 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 29.6 4K Mixed 16.7 1,660% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 41.3 DQ Mixed 16.5 2,066% 28.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 185% Great: 360%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	18.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 5.1 16% 5.73 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 4.9 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5B-Deluxe Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5B-Deluxe

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	17x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	14x
Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples	12x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	4x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x
SATAIII 256GBIntensoBench 64%, 1,687 samples	4x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	60x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	21x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $191

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16