User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRL-3F/iF
Memory124.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150922
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '17 at 12:29
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
76.1% Very good
SC Int 79.5
SC Float 80.6
SC Mixed 79.9
64% 80 Pts
QC Int 300
QC Float 307
QC Mixed 303
69% 304 Pts
MC Int 1,598
MC Float 1,585
MC Mixed 1,642
241% 1,608 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
MSI(1462 2821) 2GB
MaxC: 1342 MHz, MaxM: 1627 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Lighting 138
Reflection 108
Parallax 189
48% 145 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 152
Splatting 90.1
56% 118 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 50%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$89
221GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 250
Write 188
Mixed 203
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 10.4
52% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 8.98
51% 115 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 77%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$140
199GB free
Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 521
Write 487
Mixed 505
113% 504 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 21.7
77% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.6
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 16
38% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79%
Great: 122%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$279
4.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 90% Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$75
432GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 158
Mixed 142
115% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.23
68% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 109%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$127
54GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 87.4
Write 84.6
Mixed 84.8
64% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.19
73% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0- 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.9% Good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 24.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $310Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $229AMD RX 480 $215Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $140
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $319Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $219Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $69G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $9
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback