Asus P5KPL-AM(BM)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus P5KPL-AM(BM) (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P5KPL-AM(BM)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081203
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '20 at 10:31
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$115 20,482 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Memory 56.9 1-Core 35.3 2-Core 41.6 32% 44.6 Pts	4-Core 95 8-Core 79.8 12% 87.4 Pts	64-Core 40.3 2% 40.3 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47% Average	Lighting 55.7 Reflection 57.5 Parallax 61.8 45% 58.3 fps	MRender 69.9 Gravity 42 Splatting 69.5 50% 60.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54 24,309 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 26 8.7 40 39 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Read 68.8 Write 90.5 Mixed 52.1 SusWrite 33.1 45% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 162% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 58%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 422GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 71 72 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 75.8 Write 72 Mixed 49.6 SusWrite 71.5 50% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 51%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power256 249GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 199GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 70 81 77 76 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 48.2 Write 76 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 74.2 73% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 40%
Innostor Innostor 67GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 38GB free, PID 0902 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 28.1 Write 24.8 Mixed 18 SusWrite 24.5 32% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 1.8 6% 2.07 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16