Emachines ET1810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Emachines ET1810 (all builds)
Motherboard	eMachines EMCP73VT-PM
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090429
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '20 at 01:52
Run Duration	244 Seconds
Run User	DOM-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6750 9,456 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	33.9% Below average	Memory 59.6 1-Core 25 2-Core 50.5 31% 45 Pts	4-Core 49.2 8-Core 56.9 7% 53.1 Pts	64-Core 53.2 3% 53.2 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% EVGA(3842 1302) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Lighting 0.57 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.62 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.87 1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 40 31 37 39 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 43.2 Write 37 Mixed 32.4 SusWrite 37.1 28% 37.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 42%
WD WD400BB-60DGA0 40GB 739 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 3GB free Firmware: 14.03G14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 33 33 32 33 32 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 45.4 Write 42.7 Mixed 30 SusWrite 31.8 28% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 31%
Seagate ST3120213AS 120GB 709 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 9GB free Firmware: 3.AHL SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 41 35 37 39 42 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 54 Write 10.5 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 38.1 23% 31.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 33%
Seagate ST380011AS 80GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 9GB free Firmware: 3.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 50 50 49 50 50 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 43.2 Write 6 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 48.3 20% 27 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 32%
WD WD800BB-88JHC0 80GB 2,880 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 5GB free Firmware: 05.01C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 33 33 33 33 32 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 38.3 Write 38.8 Mixed 29 SusWrite 32 26% 34.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 31%
Samsung HD083GJ 80GB 617 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 21GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 50 50 49 50 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 73.8 Write 63.7 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 48.6 44% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 58%
Jmicron Generic 250GB 363 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 30GB free Firmware: 0508 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 18 18 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 24.2 Write 25.1 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 17.5 16% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 48%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.4 3.7 3.9 4.1 3.6 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	4.57% Terrible	Read 18.1 Write 3.7 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 3.5 9% 8 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.57% Great: 8%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 124GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 11GB free, PID 00d9 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 13 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	9.66% Terrible	Read 22 Write 21.8 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 15.6 27% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 59% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.66% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ET1810 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Emachines ET1810

CPU
Core2 Duo E7300Intel $28Bench 39%, 7,475 samples	1x
Pentium D 2.66GHzIntel $129Bench 26%, 394 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q9500IntelBench 48%, 5,111 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 545NvidiaBench 6%, 2,995 samples	1x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	1x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Emachines ET1810

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Emachines ET1810

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)