Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 620 9,076 User benchmarks, average bench 42% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 30.1 2-Core 68.3 36% 54.3 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 177 19% 151 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 905A) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.16.11.8880 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.09% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.62 1% 0.81 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 2.3 1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 1.09% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung MMCRE28GQDXP-MVB 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: VBM4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 25 39 32 26 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 25% Great: 50%
Samsung MMCRE28GQDXP-MVB 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 178GB free Firmware: VBM4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 36 61 29 32 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 25% Great: 50%
Chipsbnk UDisk 2GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	2.02% Terrible	Read 6.8 Write 0.5 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 1.4 3% 2.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.02% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	24.4% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 9.9 24% 8.23 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 7.1 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16