Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	66GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 66GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670 4,676 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 69.9 2-Core 146 60% 99.4 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 467 49% 393 Pts	64-Core 1,086 67% 1,086 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 5800 793 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Nvidia(10DE 0593) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 342.00 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	6.9% Terrible	Lighting 9.93 Reflection 7.15 Parallax 4.88 8% 7.32 fps	MRender 8.9 Gravity 9.37 Splatting 0.65 5% 6.31 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.9% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 250GB 822 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 101 85 70 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 530 Write 158 Mixed 89.3 SusWrite 84.8 47% 216 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 22.4 4K Mixed 14.9 55% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 135 113% 167 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 265%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 1TB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 599GB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9.3 7.7 8 8.8 9.4 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 200 Write 15.7 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 9.6 44% 60.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 2C 18JSF51272PZ-1G6M1 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CK0 ID:80 2C 18JSF51272PZ-1G6M1 ID:80 AD HMT325R7BFR8A-H9 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 ID:80 ... 100GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048, 16384, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.5% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.8 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16