Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	69% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF (all builds)
Memory	60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 07 '17 at 17:45
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 97.4 1-Core 142 2-Core 281 96% 173 Pts	4-Core 561 8-Core 1,063 97% 812 Pts	64-Core 1,854 115% 1,854 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 370E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2682 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69% Good	Lighting 79.2 Reflection 91.3 Parallax 74.3 65% 81.6 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 79.3 Splatting 94.9 78% 95 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290 5,772 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 477GB free Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4944 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1668 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 24 (AE) Unknown 99 99 134 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1684 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 35 25 65 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 12320 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6955 (F2) Unknown 99 99 4231	243% Outstanding	Read 2,007 Write 1,530 Mixed 1,653 385% 1,730 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 48.9 197% 75.7 MB/s	DQ Read 42.5 DQ Write 390 DQ Mixed 236 176% 223 MB/s
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 241%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 1 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4938 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1627 (B1) Unknown 99 99 30 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 1 0 (B6) Unknown 100 1 0 (B7) Unknown 100 1 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 53 50 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 211 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22228614021	85.6% Excellent	Read 525 Write 260 Mixed 335 82% 373 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 32 152% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 35.8 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 138 87% 95.8 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270 9,828 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 746GB free Firmware: ML6OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 131 131 112 (03) Spinup time 136 136 17205952920 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7617 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 150 150 27 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 16198 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4382 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7617 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7617 (C2) HDA temperature 146 146 201864314921 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	54.3% Above average	Read 93.9 Write 95.2 Mixed 80.3 67% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.25 73% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB-$351 1,197 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	151% Outstanding	MC Read 61.6 MC Write 62.3 MC Mixed 55.9 171% 59.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 24.2 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 48.7 82% 48.7 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 172%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-Designare EX-CF Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

CPU
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	56x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	52x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	43x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	27x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	10x

SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	15x
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)WD $37Bench 244%, 109,999 samples	15x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 122%, 173 samples	17x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 95%, 1,053 samples	14x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 92%, 6,789 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $968

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)