Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 78.8 2-Core 155 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 281 38% 280 Pts	64-Core 281 17% 281 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670 18,196 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Dell(1028 68E0) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.740.0.0 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	5.88% Terrible	Lighting 7.1 Reflection 9.1 Parallax 6.1 6% 7.43 fps	MRender 8.9 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 7.9 6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.88% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA 500GB 119 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: STAS Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 229 Write 176 Mixed 213 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 19.2 74% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 23.7 59% 124 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B2873FH0-CH9 M378B2873FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 6GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 12.2 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 4x2GBNanyaBench 41%, 938 samples	42x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	31x
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GBElpidaBench 40%, 1,380 samples	21x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $488

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16