Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 105 2-Core 180 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 380 50% 374 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 755M 489 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Apple(106B 011F) 1GB CLim: 1085 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	8.49% Terrible	Lighting 9.4 Reflection 12.1 Parallax 12 8% 11.2 fps	MRender 14 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 11.1 10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.49% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 360GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 358 353 337 333 339 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 354 Write 334 Mixed 318 SusWrite 347 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 28.8 4K Mixed 23.3 77% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 86.6 DQ Write 85.8 DQ Mixed 86.9 65% 86.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x43543130323436344246313630422E433136 4x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.3% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 18 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 19.6 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 755MNvidiaBench 9%, 489 samples	125x
GTX 775MNvidiaBench 21%, 479 samples	110x
GTX 780MNvidiaBench 23%, 3,739 samples	64x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	14x
SD0128F PCIe 121GBAppleBench 81%, 595 samples	11x
MX500 2TBCrucial $146Bench 108%, 44,787 samples	6x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $164

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16