Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 75.1 1-Core 78.7 2-Core 118 56% 90.6 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 196 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1652) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.91% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.4 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.91% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253L7120G 128GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.36 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 123 123 122 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 310 Write 59 Mixed 84.7 SusWrite 120 31% 144 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 11 45% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 74.5 DQ Write 50.2 DQ Mixed 19.3 26% 48 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 6GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 11.8 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.8 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	52x
Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples	48x
Pentium B960IntelBench 44%, 13,355 samples	9x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	42x
GeForce 610MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,874 samples	40x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	36x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 8,481 samples	7x
HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 21%, 1,324 samples	6x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	5x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $301

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16