| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M2A-VM (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080328 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 21 '17 at 01:32 |
| Run Duration | 386 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
|
32.8%
Below average
|
35% 57.1 Pts
|
11% 82.3 Pts
|
5% 85.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Asus(1043 82AC) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
|
4.29%
Terrible
|
4% 4.95 fps
|
4% 5.21 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
13% 4.63 GB/s
|
12% 4.17 GB/s
|
26% 153 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M2A-VM Builds (Compare 28 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M2A-VM
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples | 4x |
| Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples | 3x |
| Phenom 9550AMDBench 43%, 2,773 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 8500 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 4,580 samples | 3x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 3x |
| GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 18% - Very poor | Total price: $28 |