Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X2 555 4,836 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Memory 46.3 1-Core 45.1 2-Core 91.9 36% 61.1 Pts	4-Core 84 8-Core 88.8 11% 86.4 Pts	64-Core 93.2 6% 93.2 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 52%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF256GMC 256GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: FSTA SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 64 70 86 90 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 117 Write 98.7 Mixed 103 SusWrite 79.3 22% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 19 62% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 42.8 DQ Mixed 32.9 26% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	18% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.23 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.73 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	18x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	17x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	17x

GPU
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	20x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	9x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	9x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16