IBM Node 1, Processor Card

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	IBM Node 1, Processor Card (all builds)
Memory	238.4 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150422
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 25 '21 at 13:26
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	73%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7- 4860 34 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	47% Average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 56.9 2-Core 112 47% 77.8 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 224 24% 194 Pts	64-Core 1,435 89% 1,435 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 6TB 5.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 363 348 360 313 350 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.1% Good	Read 604 Write 444 Mixed 271 SusWrite 362 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 28.5 4K Mixed 3.8 43% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 217 153% 190 MB/s

Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$193 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2TB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 142 101 43 113 111 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.4% Poor	Read 184 Write 104 Mixed 106 SusWrite 95.6 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 2.4 39% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 70 DQ Mixed 128 72% 66.4 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 122%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 293 279 298 258 270 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 464 Write 1,031 Mixed 685 SusWrite 282 140% 616 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 1.8 62% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 13.1 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 85.2 65% 82.3 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 215%
Hitachi UltraStar 7K4000 2TB 3,101 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: MF6OAAC0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 159 154 159 140 142 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Read 160 Write 162 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 152 95% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 144% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 91%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$85 6,631 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 146 133 150 124 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 142 Write 101 Mixed 86.8 SusWrite 135 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 85%
Hitachi UltraStar 7K4000 2TB 3,101 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: MF6OAAC0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 158 153 159 141 138 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 120 Write 126 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 151 80% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 91%
Seagate ST2000LM006 HN-M201RAD 2TB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2TB free Firmware: 2BC10006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 124 122 126 119 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 114 Write 57.6 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 121 65% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 69%
Seagate ST6000NM0115-1YZ110 6TB 512 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4TB free Firmware: SN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 208 186 212 172 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 211 Write 208 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 190 123% 170 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.9 229% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K73DH0-YF8 Elpida EBJ82RF8EDWA-AE-F M393B1K73DH0-YF8 M393B1K73DH0-YF8 Hynix HMT31GR7CFR8A-G7 M393B1K73DH0-YF8 M393B1K73DH0-YF8 M393B1K73DH0-YF8 Micron 36KSF1G72PDZ-1G1M1 M393B1... 256GB 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.3% Above average	MC Read 26 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 19.7 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3.2 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16