HP Notebook

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Notebook (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 80C4
Memory	7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160517
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '17 at 20:29
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4210U 82,966 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 80.9 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 127 59% 95 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 178 25% 183 Pts	64-Core 185 11% 185 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 80C4) 1GB CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	3.53% Terrible	Lighting 3.27 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 4.88 3% 4.23 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 7.93 Splatting 6.57 5% 6.28 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.53% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 223GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 927 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 288 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 56 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 10 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3516627163	94.8% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 401 Mixed 412 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 68 4K Mixed 34.9 139% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 91.5 DQ Mixed 63.8 76% 138 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 134%
HP v100w 2GB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 3207 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.49% Terrible	Read 22.6 Write 6.31 Mixed 10.1 14% 13 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 45% 3.92 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.49% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 1315 CT102464BF160B.C16 12GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.7% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 10.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 9.9 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	1,144x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	1,029x
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	986x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,496x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,738x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,180x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	248x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	153x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	150x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	399x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	378x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	342x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16