Asus P8H67-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-V (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '17 at 11:34
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	69% Good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 180 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 447 49% 385 Pts	64-Core 445 28% 445 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple TS256C 251GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 20GB free Firmware: CJAA0201 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 26383 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 16801 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 1138383326191 (AA) Unknown 100 100 128865534034 (AB) Unknown 100 100 265 (AD) Unknown 166 166 4362863549 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 135 (C2) HDA temperature 63 42 249109217317 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	26.5% Poor	Read 180 Write 160 Mixed 167 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 0.95 33% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 10.2 DQ Write 19.3 DQ Mixed 7.56 8% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 50%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14482 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 263 (B1) Unknown 95 95 102 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 49 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 12 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12848189763	88.6% Excellent	Read 504 Write 412 Mixed 417 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 25.5 124% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 18.1 48% 101 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 115%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$54 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 930 (03) Spinup time 174 170 4275 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 302 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11899 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 301 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 270 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 31 (C2) HDA temperature 111 102 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 15
Poor: 36% Great: 76%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$54 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01V01 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 16GB 901 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 13GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	9.58% Terrible	Read 33.1 Write 15.2 Mixed 16.9 24% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.03 24% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.58% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB 1,560 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.8% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	65x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	58x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	29x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	24x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x

RAM
F3-12800CL9-4GBRL Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A-H9 Kingston 9905413-025.A00LF Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A-H9 10GBUnknownBench 43%, 16 samples	8x
M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GBUnknownBench 50%, 8 samples	6x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $333

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16