Average Bench: 0.73% (649th of 715)

Based on 150,891 user benchmarks.  Device: 8086 0102 Models: Intel(R) HD Graphics, Intel(R) HD Graphics Family

Terrible average bench

The Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) averaged 99.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 1.69fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 0.68fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) is just 0.53%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 1.21fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 0.86fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 150,891 samples)
Min Avg Max
0.5 Lighting 0.68 1.2
0.9 Reflection 1.21 1.6
0.5 Parallax 0.86 1.4
0.57% 0.92 fps
Min Avg Max
1.4 MRender 1.61 1.99
0.4 Gravity 0.52 0.9
1.2 Splatting 1.69 2.4
1.07% 1.27 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 2AB6) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2.9
2% 1.77 fps
Intel(8086 2010) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.33 fps
MSI(1462 7680) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.7
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2.4
1% 1.43 fps
Dell(1028 04F5) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2.4
1% 1.5 fps
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.1
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.1 fps
Intel(8086 2010) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.7
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.03 fps
Dell(1028 0511) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.1
0% 1 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2.4
1% 1.43 fps
150,891 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,017,798 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 150,891 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Asus(1043 844D) 11% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 1495) 7% 1% ± 0%
Dell(1028 04AD) 6% 1% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 6% 1% ± 0%
Intel(8086 2111) 6% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 1497) 4% 1% ± 0%
Dell(1028 04F5) 3% 1% ± 0%
Intel(8086 2010) 2% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 2ABF) 2% 1% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3070) 2% 1% ± 0%
Dell(1028 047E) 2% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 2AC2) 2% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 1494) 2% 1% ± 0%
Dell(1028 04EE) 2% 1% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 307C) 2% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0492) 2% 1% ± 0%
ASRock(1849 0102) 2% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 339A) 2% 1% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3077) 2% 1% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84CA) 2% 1% ± 0%
Intel(8086 2017) 1% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 1496) 1% 1% ± 0%
Dell(1028 04ED) 1% 1% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D B078) 1% 1% ± 0%
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11B9) 1% 1% ± 0%
Elitegroup(1019 3190) 1% 1% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0577) 1% 1% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2111) 1% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0589) 1% 1% ± 0%
Intel(8086 0102) 1% 1% ± 0%
Intel(8086 2002) 1% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 2AB5) 1% 1% ± 0%
Intel(8086 200D) 1% 1% ± 0%
Intel(8086 2008) 1% 1% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3612) 1% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 3397) 1% 1% ± 0%
Elitegroup(1019 7B97) 1% 1% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7797) 1% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 2AC3) 1% 1% ± 0%
Dell(1028 04AA) 1% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0660) 1% 1% ± 0%
Biostar(1565 110D) 1% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 2ADA) 1% 1% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 308C) 1% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 17A0) 0% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0493) 0% 1% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3616) 0% 1% ± 0%
Dell(1028 04AB) 0% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 1632) 0% 1% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7788) 0% 1% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) Builds (Compare 3,290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $66

Popular HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Terrible

18 months ago.

Complete ass performance in anything related to 3D


Good

18 days ago.

I used to use it. Its better than G100


Poor

4 months ago.

it can run some games but there is better options


Terrible

2 years ago.

Cannot run most games as it falls under the minimum requirements and is very slow on games that it can run.


Terrible

25 days ago.

A integrated from 2014, what you can expect from it?


Terrible

3 years ago.

Not recommended for gaming, can't even run valorant or minecraft


Terrible

1 month ago.

never ran games good cant even run roblox


Terrible

3 years ago.

Bad


Terrible

3 years ago.

Again, starting with this GPU benchmark suite change, my PC shutters while doing the GPU tests. While scores for Splatting and Gravity are 2.07 and 0.82 respectively, it can't reach above 1.5 and 0.7 respectively. This change should still be able to reach scores that the average scores has without having to readjust our GPU settings


Terrible

5 years ago.

Just Bad Perfomance


Poor

19 months ago.

This still processes some web renderings but this can't process multiple rendering like playing YouTube videos in Full HD and viewing other site at the same time. (Still useable, but very annoying)


Terrible

3 years ago.

Really awful graphics, don't use it. Lags even in flash games, while showing 1080p video (may also depend on processor, OS, browser)


Poor

6 years ago.

Low performance


Terrible

3 years ago.

cant even run tf2 and that says something


Your
opinion?
715 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback