Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 3,274 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 69.9 2-Core 135 59% 96.3 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 388 41% 326 Pts	64-Core 526 33% 526 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 051D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.1 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.7% Average	Lighting 50.2 Reflection 27.7 Parallax 75.6 41% 51.2 fps	MRender 57.7 Gravity 51.4 Splatting 42.3 40% 50.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biostar S100E-120GB 120GB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1209B SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 99 98 97 35 136 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 354 Write 161 Mixed 143 SusWrite 89.4 41% 187 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 27.5 4K Mixed 7.1 45% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 84.8 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 14.2 34% 70 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 529GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 176 177 178 176 178 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 171 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 178 109% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC72B4NA1N 2x4GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	45.1% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 15 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 8.5 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16