Asus G750JS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G750JS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JS
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 07:43
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 64
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 169
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 81.4
8-Core 213
16% 147 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 870M
Asus(1043 157D) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Lighting 29.5
Reflection 25
Parallax 37.7
24% 30.7 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 28.2
26% 32.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
567GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 344 356 368 375 388 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 456
Mixed 406
SusWrite 375
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 46.6
148% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 1
52% 115 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 133%
SD Card 2GB
2GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Read 2.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 2.8
4% 2.55 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 7%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 1.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.1
6% 5.62 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-087.A00LF Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 99U5428-018.A00LF Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JS Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback