Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za) 2,382 User benchmarks, average bench 24% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 17.4 2-Core 33.1 29% 38.4 Pts	4-Core 34.6 8-Core 32.4 5% 33.5 Pts	64-Core 35.6 2% 35.6 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310 7,882 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C680) 384MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	0.88% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.3 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.88% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB 2,908 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: O0213E SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 80 76 57 93 118 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.7% Very poor	Read 275 Write 86.2 Mixed 102 SusWrite 86.1 30% 137 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 3.5 11% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CK0 Kingston 9905469-105.A00LF 6GB 800, 800 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.05% Terrible	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 1.7 MC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.63 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 0.8 3% 1.07 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 24%, 2,382 samples	25x
E2-2000 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 27%, 927 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	25x
Radeon HD 7340AMDBench 1%, 3,203 samples	14x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
KP330 120GBKingbankBench 63%, 173 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,473 samples	4x
SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 754 samples	3x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples	2x

Value: 10% - Terrible

Total price: $89

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16