Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-DG3+  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime15.6 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 11:01
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 845-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.7% Poor
Memory 19.3
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 87.3
28% 52.2 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 182
18% 150 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.8% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 37.3
28% 36.9 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 25.8
27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 97 50 43 29 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 365
Write 303
Mixed 269
SusWrite 56.7
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 19.7
85% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 155
126% 179 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
41GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 23 50 82 119 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 17.2
Write 54.3
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 70.1
30% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.2
58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 107%
SAMSUNG HD642JJ 640GB
118GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 22 23 25 26 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 17.3
Write 8.2
Mixed 18
SusWrite 22.6
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 13.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 326
12% 326 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback