HP 600-1265qd

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP 600-1265qd (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2A9A
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '21 at 20:53
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60% Above average	Memory 92.8 1-Core 66 2-Core 105 58% 87.9 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 204 22% 178 Pts	64-Core 203 12% 203 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 230 1,567 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(1B0A 903B) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	1.97% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 1.1 2% 1.97 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 0.2 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.97% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB 12,882 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 29 29 29 2 69 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 99%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 677 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 656GB free, PID 0202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 11 10 10 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 26 Write 20.3 SusWrite 10.3 22% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 44%
WD My Passport 0740 500GB 3,483 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 363GB free, PID 0740 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.17% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 18 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 10.2 22% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.17% Great: 36%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Z3A0 1TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 57GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 22.3 Write 18.7 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 10.1 22% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 21%
Verbatim STORE N FLIP 32GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 5GB free, PID 025c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 3.6 3.6 3.6 5.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	2.4% Terrible	Read 7.3 Write 3.2 Mixed 8.7 SusWrite 4.4 8% 5.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.4% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
AD8 HMT351S6AFR8C-H9 2x4GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	39.4% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 10.4 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 600-1265qd Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: HP 600-1265qd

CPU
Core i7 Q 820Intel $119Bench 52%, 2,269 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 230NvidiaBench 4%, 1,567 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351S6AFR8C-H9 2x4GBAD8Bench 34%, 14 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP 600-1265qd

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: HP 600-1265qd

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)