Emaxx EMX-MCP61D3-iCafe

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardEmaxx EMX-MCP61D3-iCafe  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 10:17
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 455-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 97.8
1-Core 48.8
2-Core 88.7
54% 78.4 Pts
4-Core 81.4
8-Core 93.7
12% 87.6 Pts
64-Core 67
4% 67 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.5 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SS DSA2BW120G3H 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 41 25 19 22 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 17% Great: 34%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
826GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 94 92 93 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 84.5
Write 85
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 91.9
57% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFF65F-C8ML9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.4% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 10.4
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 47.2
85% 47.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EMX-MCP61D3-iCafe Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Emaxx EMX-MCP61D3-iCafe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback