Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 66.6 2-Core 127 60% 94.8 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 325 33% 266 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 130 236 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sapphire(174B 9420) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 341.95 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	2.46% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 0.7 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.9 2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.46% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3500102 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 224 Write 202 Mixed 173 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 22.9 4K Mixed 13.8 60% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 20.1 DQ Write 23.5 DQ Mixed 10.6 11% 18.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 450GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 10 113 70 14 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 107 Write 88.3 Mixed 64 SusWrite 48.5 57% 77 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 5.2 17% 5.87 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 5.4 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	21x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $388

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16