Lenovo 80F0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80F0  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo B50-45
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '22 at 12:54
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Memory 32.2
1-Core 19.4
2-Core 37.5
19% 29.7 Pts
4-Core 38.4
8-Core 38.8
5% 38.6 Pts
64-Core 38.8
2% 38.8 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3800) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.4
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032A7E660 320GB
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GGBZBG00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 39 36 32 41 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 16
Write 45.6
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 41.4
22% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3170MK58F8F1600 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4.6
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 0.3
SC Mixed 0.2
1% 0.33 GB/s
Latency 242
16% 242 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80F0 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80F0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback