Acer NG-VN7-592G-73R2

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Acer NG-VN7-592G-73R2 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer NG-VN7-592G-73R2
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161006
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 29 '22 at 09:09
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	33%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	57.2% Above average	Memory 75.7 1-Core 68.5 2-Core 126 55% 89.9 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 425 37% 317 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1039) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	2.46% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 2.7 2% 7.87 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.46% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP900NS38 256GB 685 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6.0.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 129 134 123 131 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 310 Write 192 Mixed 224 SusWrite 132 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 22.1 79% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 156 96% 102 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 81%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB 4,692 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 22GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 39 40 40 40 37 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15% Very poor	Read 38.2 Write 40.2 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 38.4 9% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 9.6 33% 9.97 MB/s	DQ Read 17.6 DQ Write 22.5 DQ Mixed 22.6 16% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 83%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 106 107 106 107 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 104 Write 73.3 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 104 63% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB 55,289 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.6% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.5 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NG-VN7-592G-73R2 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Acer NG-VN7-592G-73R2

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	1x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	1x

SSD
SP900NS38 256GBAdataBench 67%, 685 samples	1x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16