Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Memory 29.3 1-Core 22.3 2-Core 42.1 20% 31.2 Pts	4-Core 61.4 8-Core 65.8 8% 63.6 Pts	64-Core 66.1 4% 66.1 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0487) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.62% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.62 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.22 1% 0.92 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.62% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PH3-CE240 240GB 172 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: F/W:1.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1106 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 388 (AA) Unknown 100 100 93 (AD) Unknown 100 100 196624 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 50 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 774 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3060	46.7% Average	Read 257 Write 248 Mixed 259 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 10.1 64% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 21.2 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 54.7 44% 60.1 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 93%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 5,095 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 474GB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 26.7 Write 23.6 Mixed 24.7 32% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.26 66% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 52%
Mass Storage Device 320GB 2,915 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 190GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 26.8 Write 22.7 Mixed 14.2 26% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.21 54% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 00 4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 4.5 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 0.5 SC Mixed 0.3 1% 0.33 GB/s	Latency 259 16% 259 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	28x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	2x
XPG SX900 128GBAdata $103Bench 68%, 6,500 samples	1x
520 Series 240GBIntel $139Bench 78%, 12,595 samples	1x

RAM
HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 2x2GBHynixBench 24%, 1,873 samples	1x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 2,491 samples	1x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	1x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $230

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16