Acer Aspire M5811

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Aspire M5811 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer H57M01
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091231
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '17 at 00:11
Run Duration	308 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 94 1-Core 74.3 2-Core 145 65% 104 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 367 42% 325 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 285-$189 6,276 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Gigabyte(1458 229D) 2GB CLim: 973 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Lighting 45 Reflection 50.6 Parallax 59.6 37% 51.7 fps	MRender 49.5 Gravity 39.2 Splatting 36 33% 41.6 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 447GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 61 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 42069220	53% Above average	Read 267 Write 211 Mixed 220 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 18.4 93% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 29.9 DQ Write 49.7 DQ Mixed 18 20% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 253 253 7275 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2848 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 19822 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2797 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 162 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2685 (C2) HDA temperature 104 87 48 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.3% Good	Read 117 Write 107 Mixed 114 85% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.29 104% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 85%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 18GB free Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 80 (03) Spinup time 177 177 25802506614 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6716 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 34 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7699 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1213 (C0) Power-off retract count 84 84 19802 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 84 84 19802 (C2) HDA temperature 136 136 261994053676 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57.3% Above average	Read 96.4 Write 103 Mixed 126 82% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.19 78% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 92%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	4.35% Terrible	Read 15.3 Write 5.6 Mixed 5.53 9% 8.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.83 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.004 14% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.35% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GB 2,488 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 11.9 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 12.8 32% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M5811 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5811

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	43x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	37x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	33x

GPU
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	7x

SSD
530 Series 120GBIntel $79Bench 67%, 15,015 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 3x2GBToshibaBench 31%, 210 samples	10x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 4x2GBToshibaBench 34%, 148 samples	9x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $151

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16