Asus G10AC

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus G10AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G10AC
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131206
Uptime	10.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '17 at 14:06
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Memory 92.1 1-Core 116 2-Core 227 83% 145 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 587 64% 507 Pts	64-Core 589 36% 589 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Nvidia(10DE 1033) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	35.1% Below average	Lighting 42 Reflection 38.9 Parallax 51.2 34% 44 fps	MRender 53.6 Gravity 48.8 Splatting 35.9 37% 46.1 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 90GB-$96 764 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.3.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 90 90 11923534 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 -28690381514916 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3358 (AB) Unknown 0 0 3 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 31 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 3 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 31 57 68723212319 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11923534 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 3 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11923534 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11923534 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 16945 (EA) Unknown 0 0 17057 (F1) Unknown 0 0 17057 (F2) Unknown 0 0 25038	63.5% Good	Read 497 Write 102 Mixed 155 54% 251 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 93 4K Mixed 11.8 112% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 37 52% 98.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 78%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 131 131 34388246965 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3418 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13795 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2363 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3572 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3572 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 231929348135 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	93.7% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 159 Mixed 161 123% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.22 94% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 107%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250 11,608 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 874GB free Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 212611418 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2852 (05) Reallocated sector count 92 92 365 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 7475952 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 8781 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1426 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 43 43 57 (BC) Unknown 100 99 23 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 70 54 521469982 (C2) HDA temperature 30 46 64424509470 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 32 31 212611418 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 29 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -83361020239041 (F1) Unknown 100 253 320262918 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4006205234	54.1% Above average	Read 104 Write 84.6 Mixed 89.5 70% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.52 107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SLB304G08-GGNHM 2x8GB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 17.4 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 20.3 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G10AC Builds (Compare 364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G10AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	212x
Core i7-4770SIntel $102Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	92x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	35x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	25x

SSD
RBU-SC400S37128G 128GBKingstonBench 70%, 864 samples	16x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	37x
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	22x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 4x8GBKingstonBench 56%, 370 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16