MSI GF615M-P33 (MS-7597)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive19.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7597
MotherboardMSI GF615M-P33 (MS-7597)  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110223
Uptime12 Days
Run DateNov 15 '17 at 17:47
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 36.9
2-Core 64.1
35% 53.3 Pts
4-Core 66.8
8-Core 71.7
9% 69.2 Pts
64-Core 68
4% 68 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
MSI(1462 7597) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.8
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 110
Write 77.6
Mixed 70
19% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.71
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 4.96
32% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 12.2
DQ Write 33.9
DQ Mixed 6.91
10% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB 14h SDRAM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GF615M-P33 (MS-7597) Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI GF615M-P33 (MS-7597)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback