Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 5.44% (401st of 713)

Based on 58,337 user benchmarks.  Devices: 1002 6613, 1002 6611 Models: AMD Radeon R7 200, ASUS R7 240, AMD Radeon R7 240

Terrible average bench

The AMD R7 240 averaged 94.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 6.72fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 6.02fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R7 240 is just 2.88%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R7 240 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 8.24fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 9.33fps

Average Bench

(Based on 58,337 samples)
Min Avg Max
4.57 Lighting 6.72 8
4 Reflection 8.24 10.5
6.5 Parallax 9.33 10.7
5.47% 8.1 fps
Min Avg Max
3.4 MRender 6.98 9.6
5.1 Gravity 7 8.3
3.2 Splatting 6.02 7.13
5.4% 6.67 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 9
Parallax 10.4
8% 9.7 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 6.4
6% 7.2 fps
Gigabyte(1458 226B) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1046.0
Lighting 9
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 10.4
7% 9.77 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 6.9
6% 7.4 fps
Asus(1043 04C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 9.4
6% 8.5 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 7
Splatting 6.5
6% 6.93 fps
Sapphire(174B E263) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 9
Parallax 9
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 6.3
6% 6.83 fps
XFX(1682 7240) 1GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 8.9
6% 8.07 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 6.2
5% 6.6 fps
XFX(1682 7240) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.50.02
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 8.9
5% 8 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 6.2
5% 6.57 fps
Asus(1043 048B) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 8.6
5% 7.63 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 6.1
5% 6.63 fps
AMD(1002 A409) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 667 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 8.8
5% 7.67 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 5.9
5% 6.07 fps
Gigabyte(1458 22B0) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 10.3
0% 6.53 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 6.6
6% 6.93 fps
58,337 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,447,299 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 58,337 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Asus(1043 048B) 11% 5% ± 0%
MSI(1462 8094) 11% 4% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B E263) 10% 5% ± 0%
Asus(1043 04C5) 6% 6% ± 1%
AMD(1002 A409) 6% 5% ± 0%
Dell(1028 210B) 5% 5% ± 0%
AMD(1002 0000) 5% 6% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90D3) 5% 6% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 22B0) 4% 6% ± 0%
Dell(1028 2121) 4% 6% ± 0%
XFX(1682 7240) 4% 5% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2335) 3% 5% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B E266) 3% 6% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90C4) 2% 6% ± 1%
Asus(1043 85F1) 2% 6% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 4248) 2% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 85B3) 2% 6% ± 0%
Device(1642 3C79) 1% 6% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0543) 1% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 869E) 1% 6% ± 0%
AMD(1002 2B0A) 1% 5% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90DF) 1% 6% ± 0%
AMD(1002 0123) 1% 6% ± 0%
Device(1642 3D79) 1% 6% ± 1%
Dell(1028 1711) 1% 4% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 2346) 1% 3% ± 0%
Device(1642 3F69) 1% 6% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 2014) 1% 6% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E248) 1% 6% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 226B) 0% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 04CF) 0% 4% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2012) 0% 5% ± 0%
Device(1545 7240) 0% 5% ± 0%
Device(17AF 2000) 0% 5% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B D340) 0% 6% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B 7430) 0% 6% ± 0%
Diamond(1092 0240) 0% 6% ± 1%
Diamond(1092 2400) 0% 5% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E280) 0% 6% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0541) 0% 6% ± 0%
Dell(1028 012F) 0% 5% ± 0%
Device(85B3 1043) 0% 7% ± 0%
MSI(1462 3373) 0% 6% ± 0%
Dell(1028 1002) 0% 6% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E294) 0% 4% ± 0%
HP(103C 3375) 0% 6% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 368F) 0% 4% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical R7 240 Builds (Compare 2,148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70

Popular R7 240 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good

5 months ago.

it can play roblox smoothly unlike intel


Good

2 years ago.

Ахуенная карта ебет gt 730 в анал жестко.


Good

15 months ago.

Runs quite hot and fails to run even basic games might be worth getting if prices fall through the floor good enough for non- gaming tasks. able to run games from 2012 anything more recent is too much for this card.


Excellent

23 months ago.

this is so bad apex is going like 10-20fps


Good

2 months ago.

Originally when it first came out it had a poor reputation, however overtime it's price decreased and so it now makes a great upgrade from a GT 720.


Excellent

4 years ago.

Have had it for 4 years, it isn't the top of the line at all, but it does what it's supposed to do.


Excellent

4 years ago.

Economic and powerful, noiseless and good cooling


Excellent

3 years ago.

Basic games are running great.


Excellent

5 years ago.

very cheap, pretty good for low-end gaming


Excellent

4 years ago.

Great upgrade from a GT 720.


Excellent

6 years ago.

A melhor placa para quem não quer gastar dinheiro e jogar!


Excellent

4 years ago.

RASPUTIN


Your
opinion?
713 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback