Toshiba Qosmio X300

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Toshiba Qosmio X300 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA KSRAA
Memory	0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090310
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '17 at 20:39
Run Duration	485 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42 8,502 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Memory 70.1 1-Core 31.1 2-Core 62.5 38% 54.6 Pts	4-Core 61.7 8-Core 65.9 8% 63.8 Pts	64-Core 36.5 2% 36.5 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800M GTX 100 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Toshiba(1179 FF01) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8642 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	4.54% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 6.58 Parallax 2.31 5% 5.1 fps	MRender 3.76 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 3.39 3% 4.02 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.54% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 38GB free Firmware: Z331 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 62 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 9 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4297850920 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 53 33 287762808879 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 55836016662 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 368 (EA) Unknown 100 100 382 (F1) Unknown 253 253 375 (F2) Unknown 253 253 2 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	27.4% Poor	Read 215 Write 106 Mixed 98.2 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 15.1 4K Mixed 2.44 27% 9.41 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 57.3 DQ Mixed 6.12 31% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 70%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50 12,013 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 192 183 1358 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 775 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 21694 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 766 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 203 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 179 179 63745 (C2) HDA temperature 106 94 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	51.4% Above average	Read 93.3 Write 85.9 Mixed 5.72 44% 61.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.25 75% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.6 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio X300 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X300

CPU
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples	2x
Core2 Extreme X9100Intel $150Bench 41%, 548 samples	2x
Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9800M GTXNvidiaBench 6%, 100 samples	5x
GeForce 9700M GTSNvidiaBench 3%, 174 samples	4x

SSD
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	6x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	2x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $142

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16