Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	43.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230202
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '23 at 16:17
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$166 15,311 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 52.8 1-Core 137 2-Core 265 79% 151 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 869 82% 683 Pts	64-Core 1,439 89% 1,439 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 108%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB 9,606 User benchmarks, average bench 403% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1193 1198 1210 1861 2078 1190 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	279% Outstanding	Read 2,150 Write 2,421 Mixed 2,245 SusWrite 1,455 466% 2,068 MB/s	4K Read 49.6 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 68.7 220% 75.3 MB/s	DQ Read 924 DQ Write 645 DQ Mixed 774 581% 781 MB/s
Poor: 253% ↑ This bench: 279% Great: 515%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB 2,391 User benchmarks, average bench 402% 1TB free Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 790 831 803 794 779 823 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	225% Outstanding	Read 1,865 Write 1,540 Mixed 1,611 SusWrite 804 326% 1,455 MB/s	4K Read 47.8 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 62.4 206% 70.6 MB/s	DQ Read 990 DQ Write 678 DQ Mixed 802 607% 824 MB/s
Poor: 253% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 519%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 454GB free Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 621 710 757 769 690 587 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	177% Outstanding	Read 1,205 Write 1,048 Mixed 840 SusWrite 689 212% 945 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 51.9 187% 65.7 MB/s	DQ Read 634 DQ Write 682 DQ Mixed 274 312% 530 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 295%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDR 4x16GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	62.1% Good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 25.9 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 14.6 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 151 26% 151 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,044x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	450x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	396x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	331x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	313x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	256x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	89x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	86x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	77x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	103x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	97x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	93x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $617

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16