Asus G750JZ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G750JZ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JZ
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140220
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 16 '23 at 16:38
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 164
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 419
44% 353 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 74%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 206 202 199 207 264 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 371
Write 178
Mixed 200
SusWrite 225
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 22.5
85% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 54.5
DQ Write 57.9
DQ Mixed 111
68% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 KHX1600C9S3L/8G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JZ Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $470
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback