Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	97.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon L5640 538 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Memory 78.5 1-Core 39.9 2-Core 79.9 44% 66.1 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 322 28% 240 Pts	64-Core 695 43% 695 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Asus(1043 881D) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.68 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.6% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 112 Parallax 116 104% 119 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 99.9 Splatting 85.4 85% 107 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 225 236 237 239 237 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.1% Good	Read 255 Write 242 Mixed 242 SusWrite 234 55% 243 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 32.4 4K Mixed 28.6 93% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 191 144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 129%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 4TB 781 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 8GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 15 15 12 13 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 160%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:83 0B NT8GC72C4NB3NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72C4NB3NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72C4NB3NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72C4NB3NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72C4NB3NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72C4NB3NK-CG 82GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	44.9% Average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 18.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 6.2 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	319x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16