Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151005
Uptime	14 Days
Run Date	May 09 '23 at 22:47
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 81.9 1-Core 52.4 2-Core 87.3 49% 73.9 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 270 28% 227 Pts	64-Core 262 16% 262 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6162) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.9% Above average	Lighting 62.9 Reflection 65.5 Parallax 60.3 51% 62.9 fps	MRender 65.5 Gravity 67.3 Splatting 62.8 53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S3712 120GB 503 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 194 Write 188 Mixed 158 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 39.7 4K Mixed 7.8 62% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 31 DQ Write 76.1 DQ Mixed 36.4 33% 47.8 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 49%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 91GB free Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 99 101 98 102 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 113 Write 116 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 102 64% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 107%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 53GB free Firmware: 0006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 49 50 53 52 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 54.2 Write 45 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 50.1 33% 44.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 12.5 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 10.4 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	101x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	43x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	44x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	37x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 16GBUnknownBench 39%, 564 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16