Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
5 days ago, 4 days ago.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateDec 05 '17 at 21:29
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-4690K-$235
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.2% Very good
SC Int 126
SC Float 114
SC Mixed 120
96% 120 Pts
QC Int 365
QC Float 376
QC Mixed 372
84% 371 Pts
MC Int 428
MC Float 426
MC Mixed 447
65% 434 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$180
Gigabyte(1458 3690) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 107
Reflection 102
Parallax 112
34% 107 fps
MRender 73.9
Gravity 109
Splatting 73
37% 85.4 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 45%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$86
48GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 407
Mixed 416
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 42.8
162% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 91.2
114% 204 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 107%
Great: 117%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$109
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 78
Write 73.5
Mixed 65.4
54% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.25
69% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 66%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$74
863GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 133
Write 108
Mixed 111
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.15
61% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 83%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$84
33GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 69.5
Write 79.1
Mixed 88.8
60% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.2
81% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB-$128
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $854
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $114
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $200SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback