Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 3,243 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 75.8 1-Core 78.4 2-Core 196 65% 117 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 463 48% 389 Pts	64-Core 511 32% 511 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000 8,562 User benchmarks, average bench 89% Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 528.89 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.4% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 112 Parallax 104 92% 110 fps	MRender 73.6 Gravity 112 Splatting 98.9 79% 95 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256TDL-1AW1ZABFA 256GB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: A000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 324 207 213 216 218 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 292 Write 381 Mixed 327 SusWrite 253 71% 313 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 31.7 103% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 162 143% 216 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 100%
Seagate ST2000NM0055-1V4104 2TB 515 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 638GB free Firmware: SD02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 187 190 189 190 193 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 161 Mixed 96 SusWrite 189 113% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 1.2 269% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 113%
Hitachi HUS722T2TALA604 2TB 1,161 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: RR04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 186 187 187 186 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 184 Mixed 118 SusWrite 187 123% 167 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1 368% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1K43BB1-CTD M393A1K43BB1-CTD M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1K43BB1-CTD 48GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2400, 2400, 2667, 2667, 2400, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.2% Excellent	MC Read 24.2 MC Write 45.4 MC Mixed 32.6 97% 34.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 16.4 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 88.7 45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 92%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	13x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	12x
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples	7x

SSD
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK256MBFZ 256GBBench 90%, 162 samples	6x
MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GBSamsungBench 98%, 467 samples	6x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	5x

RAM
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	7x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 66%, 1,144 samples	4x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16