ADD TO PC
BUILD

1e657 1E657A74

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	1e657 1E657A74 (all builds)
Motherboard	EVGA EVGA P55 SLI E657
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110503
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '16 at 03:13
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 95.6 1-Core 70 2-Core 141 64% 102 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 358 38% 301 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250 11,945 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Device(0000 0000) 896MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4174 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	8.55% Terrible	Lighting 11.6 Reflection 9.42 Parallax 5.22 10% 8.76 fps	MRender 9.52 Gravity 9.03 Splatting 6.83 7% 8.46 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.55% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 6 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3059 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3700 (E8) Unknown 100 100 11436838833 (E9) Unknown 99 0 99	48.7% Average	Read 326 Write 158 Mixed 186 49% 223 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 21.9 70% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 92 DQ Write 84.5 DQ Mixed 34.3 40% 70.3 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 104%
OCZ VERTEX-TURBO 64GB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 18GB free Firmware: 1.7 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 125 18 0 (0C) Power cycle count 3 25 0 (B8) Unknown 21 0 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 0 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 0 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 0 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 160 157 116154 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 124 161 45558 (C8) Write error rate 137 135 2360 (C9) Soft read error rate 137 217 1009 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 4 91 78 (CB) Run out cancel 112 169 71 (CC) Soft ECC correction 0 0 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 136 19 0 (CE) Flying height 21 0 0 (CF) Spin high current 28 12 0 (D0) Spin buzz 167 4 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 77 0 0 (D3) Unknown 0 0 0 (D4) Unknown 0 0 0 (D5) Unknown 0 0 0	29.1% Poor	Read 194 Write 102 Mixed 111 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 9.26 4K Mixed 5.71 48% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 62.4 DQ Write 9.36 DQ Mixed 6.45 12% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 36%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 380GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 229 227 8533 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11226 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7560 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6541 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 273 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11224 (C2) HDA temperature 121 110 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	50.6% Above average	Read 89.5 Write 86.5 Mixed 43.8 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.44 116% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 69%
FANTOM ST1500DL003-9VT1 1.5TB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1TB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 25.2 Mixed 15 28% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.44 51% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	42.4% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 11.9 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 10 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 55.2 72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback