Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150805
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '16 at 21:29
Run Duration	248 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	55% Above average	Memory 79.8 1-Core 45.6 2-Core 89.1 47% 71.5 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 212 25% 191 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Zotac(19DA 2368) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5906 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.4% Above average	Lighting 56.6 Reflection 64.9 Parallax 72.2 46% 64.6 fps	MRender 80.9 Gravity 78 Splatting 69.8 62% 76.3 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 305GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1289 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 253 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 61 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 54 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2814037373	45.5% Average	Read 260 Write 248 Mixed 223 54% 244 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 25 4K Mixed 13.6 61% 19.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.4 DQ Write 40.9 DQ Mixed 15.3 17% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 58GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5374 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 605 (B1) Unknown 98 98 22 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 54 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 158 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9169351776	47.1% Average	Read 345 Write 193 Mixed 204 54% 247 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 13 67% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 34.7 DQ Write 45.7 DQ Mixed 16.2 19% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 118%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1TB free Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 79 (03) Spinup time 124 124 51580306033 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1400 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5879 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 656 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1547 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1547 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 227633987611 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68.3% Good	Read 110 Write 128 Mixed 69.4 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.2 91% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 846GB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 187608816 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1904 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 14778869 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12782 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1309 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 27 27 73 (BE) vendor-specific 74 47 437846042 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 253 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 68 68 65829 (C2) HDA temperature 26 53 38654705690 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 59712930324929 (F1) Unknown 100 253 47094824852 (F2) Unknown 100 253 33205125055	91.6% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 156 Mixed 32.5 85% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.23 79% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 45GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 99 27140219 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2425 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 410751328 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 18934 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2071 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 77310656554 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 51 487915549 (C2) HDA temperature 29 49 34359738397 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 32 27 27140219 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -62556198641765 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1831061735 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1042423537	37% Below average	Read 63.7 Write 65.2 Mixed 23.7 37% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.43 84% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 OCZ3P1333LV2G CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 OCZ3P1333LV2G 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28% Poor	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 10 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.9 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	127x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	73x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16