Asus PRO Q470M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	4.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	382% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus PRO Q470M-C (all builds)
Memory	59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210714
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '23 at 18:44
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900-$279 11,130 User benchmarks, average bench 94% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Memory 83.3 1-Core 151 2-Core 301 96% 178 Pts	4-Core 590 8-Core 947 94% 769 Pts	64-Core 1,344 83% 1,344 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 39,219 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.76% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 10.1 Parallax 8.8 5% 8.3 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 0.3 4% 6.33 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.76% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190 14,975 User benchmarks, average bench 438% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2358 2358 2316 2337 2322 2320 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	382% Outstanding	Read 2713 Write 2,399 Mixed 1,987 SusWrite 2,335 530% 2,358 MB/s	4K Read 57.7 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 80.4 266% 93.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,290 DQ Write 871 DQ Mixed 1,079 806% 1,080 MB/s
Poor: 261% ↑ This bench: 382% Great: 564%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 446GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 477 477 479 430 292 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 487 Mixed 466 SusWrite 438 107% 475 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 95.6 4K Mixed 54.2 180% 63.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 353 265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-20-20 D4-3200 4x16GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.5% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 22.6 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 35 SC Mixed 23.5 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	56	30	31.5"	1280 720	DELD0F2 DELL S3220DGF

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRO Q470M-C Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 108%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRO Q470M-C

CPU
Core i7-10700Intel $232Bench 93%, 71,010 samples	9x
Core i9-10850KIntel $279Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	5x
Core i7-10700KFIntel $200Bench 96%, 37,394 samples	3x

GPU
RTX 2080Nvidia $389Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	2x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 39,219 samples	2x
Quadro K1200NvidiaBench 13%, 4,005 samples	2x

SSD
512G 512GBHs-ssd-e100Bench 74%, 2,522 samples	2x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP500CM30001 500GBSeagateBench 193%, 3,097 samples	2x

RAM
9905743-045.A00G 1x16GBKingstonBench 44%, 468 samples	3x
W642GU44J2320NC 4x16GBAvantBench 105%, 24 samples	3x
3200 C16 Series 4x16GBPatriotBench 91%, 442 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $621

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16