PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds) |
Memory | 8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170915 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 12 '18 at 13:22 |
Run Duration | 307 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
89.1%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Zotac(19DA 1394) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
76.8%
Very good
|
||||
38.2%
Below average
|
||||
39.6%
Below average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
|
113%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 559x |
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 528x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 470x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 216x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 199x |
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples | 123x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $864 |