Asus Crosshair IV Extreme

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	66.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Extreme (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111028
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '18 at 16:43
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 76.1 1-Core 67.4 2-Core 135 56% 92.9 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 340 36% 287 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.8% Good	Lighting 71.3 Reflection 102 Parallax 111 58% 94.8 fps	MRender 98.1 Gravity 103 Splatting 104 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 240GB-$232 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 8043785 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 81784767256736 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2749 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 684 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 0 0 2670 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8043785 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8043785 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8043785 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 12372 (EA) Unknown 0 0 14245 (F1) Unknown 0 0 14245 (F2) Unknown 0 0 16129	48.9% Average	Read 211 Write 169 Mixed 150 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 15.6 82% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 37.4 55% 103 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 502GB free Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 48228901 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4723 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 68 60 86039064692 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7998 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4097 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 87 87 13 (BC) Unknown 100 91 833 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 47 656080935 (C2) HDA temperature 39 53 68719476775 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 41 30 48228901 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -66567698101974 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3443674358 (F2) Unknown 100 253 781951491	64.1% Good	Read 120 Write 104 Mixed 102 82% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.63 130% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 68%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 254GB free Firmware: JKAOA3NH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 98 98 4 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 101 (03) Spinup time 124 124 51575915108 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1553 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 36 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 35433 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 778 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1603 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1603 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 249109217320 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	61.2% Good	Read 110 Write 103 Mixed 108 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.31 87% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 4,489 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.2% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 14.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 12.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Extreme Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 47%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Extreme

CPU
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	15x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	11x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	3x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	2x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x
CS900 240GBPNY $25Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	2x

RAM
CMT8GX3M4A1866C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 49%, 53 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 2000 C10 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 102 samples	3x
Dominator DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 2,880 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $573

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16