Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121015
Uptime13.8 Days
Run DateMar 04 '18 at 08:06
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 178
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 304
40% 300 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 69.3
Parallax 63.2
56% 67.1 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 54.7
51% 63.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 180
Mixed 134
124% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.22
82% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
535GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 149
Write 153
Mixed 87.1
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.15
67% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 114%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
1TB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 29
Mixed 29.7
38% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.34
74% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX Transcend JM1333KLH-8G 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $454
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback