Fujitsu CELSIUS R920power

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R920power  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 x 65536 colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 07 '18 at 20:06
Run Duration56 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 172
56% 102 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 583
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 1667
103% 1667 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 74%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
721GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 290
Mixed 190
169% 226 MB/s
4K Read 1.21
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.75
156% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 140%
Great: 219%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41HE4BDFA- 16x4GB
16 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 31
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback